Campaigns RSS Feed


Boost from No 10 as petition reaches 1,000 signatures

Echo reporter Harry Hogger, Norah Riley- Smith, Gordon Brown and Jim Knight Echo reporter Harry Hogger, Norah Riley- Smith, Gordon Brown and Jim Knight

FREE swimming campaigner Norah Riley-Smith has taken her campaign to the very top.

The Age Concern trustee and volunteer was invited to a reception at 10 Downing Street to discuss her campaign for free swimming for under-16s and over-60s in Weymouth and Portland with Prime Minister Gordon Brown.

And Mrs Riley-Smith, who is trying to force Weymouth and Portland Borough Council to rethink its decision to reject the free swimming scheme in a campaign backed by the Dorset Echo, received the premier’s support during a positive meeting.

The success came as the number of people signing a petition launched by Nora hit 1,000.

At the reception organised by South Dorset MP Jim Knight at Downing Street, Mr Brown said that as well as offering physical benefits swimming also had social benefits that would be increased if free swimming was on offer. He said getting more people in the water would be ‘a great plus for the community’.

Mr Brown said that the free swimming was a Government initiative but it was up to each local authority to decide whether to take it up.

“We made it possible for the councils to do it and it’s up to the councils to make the decision.”

The Prime Minister said he had fond memories of the resort and recalled his last trip to the area, in the summer of 2007, when he had been forced to cut short his holiday following the foot and mouth outbreak.

He said: “Weymouth is a great place and there are a lot of people who want to go swimming in Weymouth.”

Mr Brown praised Mrs Riley-Smith for her efforts and thanked her for making the trip up to London to see him.

Mrs Riley-Smith said she was grateful to everyone who had signed the petition so far and said the meeting had motivated her to continue her efforts.

She added: “I enjoyed the day immensely, to have the support of MP Jim Knight and it was a privilege to meet the Prime Minister.

“It was a wonderful experience, Mr Brown was very supportive and seemed genuinely interested.

“It has spurred me on to continue with enthusiasm.”

Mr Knight said: “Having found resources across Government to enable local authorities to offer free swimming, if there are councils that reject the money Mr Brown is obviously concerned to hear from representatives of pensioners in the area as to what the effects will be.

“Norah put her case very strongly as to why the council should reverse its decision and, like everybody else, Mr Brown was perplexed as to how the council can justify it.”

Comments(11)

mikeman says...
12:02pm Mon 23 Mar 09

Very nice for her but did she ask Gordon Brown if he or his government would be paying ALL the costs of the free swimming for two years so that it would be 100% free with no cost at all for the local council tax payer, if the answer was yes it would have been nice to have it in writing.
Not that I am implying anything.

maximus says...
12:15pm Mon 23 Mar 09

There ain't no such thing as a free lunch (or free swimming), some-one has to pay, perhaps Gordon and Jim could be persuaded to forgo some of their salaries and pension funds.

I Don't Like The New Echo Website says...
12:32pm Mon 23 Mar 09

Why was this article delayed from Saturday?

I think that the Dorset Echo is misleading all of its readers (i.e customers). As they clearly support Labour, at least admit it. The Daily Mail and The Mirror don't hide their support.

If the current council were controlled by Labour, this article would never have been printed.

Getting the PM and Jim Knight involved (as well as other Labour ministers) to try and force the local council to provide free swimming is laughable. In 2 years time, when the funding runs out from central Government, it will be us that has to make up the difference.

It is interesting that the PM is keen to hear from any retired people affected by the lack of free swimming. It is a shame that he is not so interested in hearing from retired people that have been affected by the Post Office closures.

Why did the Dorset Echo not have a campaign such as this for the Post Office closures?

The Dorset Echo doesn't cover the local elections in any great depth to avoid any claims of political bias, but as soon as they can knock the Tory led council, they jump at the chance.

As a journalist for a local newspaper that should not have any political bias, having your picture taken with the PM and Jim Knight is unprofessional and deceitful.

Ask Archie says...
12:52pm Mon 23 Mar 09

maximus wrote:
There ain't no such thing as a free lunch (or free swimming), some-one has to pay, perhaps Gordon and Jim could be persuaded to forgo some of their salaries and pension funds.
I have been saying since this started that someone will have to pay, and like the free bus passes for OAP's it will cause W&PBC a finance problem in later years,which we will all(swimmers or not) have to pick up the tab for.

Birdseye says...
1:55pm Mon 23 Mar 09

Why is this report, and the Echo’s “Campaign”, and Knight’s “support” , restricted to the over-60’s? And why has it been left so late?
On 6th June 2008, Tessa Jowell said “Today we are demonstrating how we will turn the rhetoric of the 2012 legacy into fact. There is something for everyone in our plans - every part of the country, every section of the population. Ten million people stand to benefit from our exciting free swimming plan alone. I hope that this is just the beginning and that by 2012 we can offer free swimming to all”
On 7th October, the Department for Culture, media, and Sport wrote to all Local Authorities, informing them that 300 Local Authorities had chosen to offer free swimming to local residents aged 60+, and 296 had also submitted an expression of interest in applying for funding to provide free swimming to those aged 16 and under.
The offers (and the Pots of money) are now closed.
West Dorset will receive £43401 for the over 60’s, £44319 for the under 16’s, and and additiona pro-rata population-based allocation of £21893.
Where authorities such as West Dorset – that do not own their own pools – can demonstrate that they have made suitable arrangements with neighbouring authorities that do, then the financial assistance is transferable to the neighbouring authority.
--------------------
--------------
"Mr Brown was very supportive and seemed genuinely interested. "
It's part of the job.. along with kissing babies and claiming expenses.
--------------

And I agree with the comment about impartial reporting. Posing with the PM may be an ego trip for the reporter concerned (though much dampened by Knight’s presence (security word = 'Loss-Club')), but such pics are for the family album.
No responsible newspaper would have published it.

Phaedrus says...
2:06pm Mon 23 Mar 09

It would only be surprising if Gordon Brown didn't support it, it is a government initiative, it is popular because "free", and we are close to an election with Labour desperate to win back votes. Of course the Echo should report it, but the Echo should also make clear what free swimming and buses are doing to our local finances.

mikeman says...
4:04pm Mon 23 Mar 09

This is getting out of hand the idea behind free swimming is to make the population healthier thereby saving money on health care which I think is a very good idea,the two year trial period is supposed to be totally funded by the government so in effect everybody in the land will be paying for it, so if the majority of councils will be offering free swimming even the people in the councils that don't will still be paying for others to swim i.e. people from West Dorset will be able to come to Weymouth and swim for free while the people of Weymouth pay for it. I see no reason not to offer it to our residents providing it is made clear it is on a 2 year trial basis.
As for the politics of the Echo or any other paper I think that is irrelevant they have seen what they perceive to be a good cause and are giving it their support.
As for the comparison with the Post Office it may be that the Echo considers them to be as obsolete as I do and that the closures are justified.
One final point I do agree that nothing is free but who complains about the other things we all pay for such as schools/libraries and all the other services that are expected in our society we all start as under sixteen's and finish up as over sixties so somewhere along the line we are all eligible.

Birdseye says...
5:21pm Mon 23 Mar 09

Mikeman said: "i.e. people from West Dorset will be able to come to Weymouth and swim for free while the people of Weymouth pay for it."

Not quite true: In the scenario that you describe, Weymouth would receive West Dorset's funding.


Genghis says...
6:19pm Mon 23 Mar 09

Birdseye wrote:
Mikeman said: "i.e. people from West Dorset will be able to come to Weymouth and swim for free while the people of Weymouth pay for it." Not quite true: In the scenario that you describe, Weymouth would receive West Dorset's funding.
Yes W&PBC would get that money but it would still mean people from West Dorset will get free entry to use W&PBC's swimming pool while people from Weymouth and Portland will have to pay for theirselves. If this scheme is to work it should be compulsory for all Councils to comply AND it should be funded completely from National Government funds.

Never Wrong says...
9:18pm Mon 23 Mar 09

Shameful this thread, Give people something free and all you hear are negative comments how they are spending THERE money,
Personally i think you should scrap the free swimming for the over 60s because they get enough i.e free medicine, free buses free tv over 75 and get a fair wack of money to spend on there heating biils and still moan about not getting enough help...
We should concentrate on getting all the under 16 swimming well especially living by the sea.

I Don't Like The New Echo Website says...
7:11am Tue 24 Mar 09

Nevr Wrong- nothing is free! Is this so hard to comprehend?

After the 2 year trial, Central Government will remove funding but will probably force local councils to continue the offer (a bit like forcing councils to adopt unwanted bus lanes in exchange for funding and perks).

By the way, it is "their money" not "there money". If you are going to be critical, please ensure you have used the correct word.

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree