Caravan park development at beauty spot sparks outcry

Dorset Echo: The site at Seatown, Chideock The site at Seatown, Chideock

PLANS for a restaurant, indoor swimming pool, wildlife pond, laundry and static lodge-style caravans at a beauty spot on the Dorset coast have stirred up a hornet’s nest of opposition.

There are 133 representations – the majority objecting – to West Dorset Leisure Holiday’s plans to upgrade Golden Cap caravan park.

But park owner Martin Cox says he must keep the business competitive and said the old-fashioned ‘bucket and spade’ holiday is no longer enough to attract visitors.

Ranged against him are villagers and holidaymakers who say traffic will increase and the park will become a ‘blot on the landscape’.

As well as individual protests The Chideock Society and the parish council oppose the plans which would see the park open for 11 months of the year, not eight as currently, the replacement of touring caravans with static ones, as well as a new staff car park, restaurant and laundry facilities.

West Dorset District Council senior economic regeneration officer Trevor Hedger and leisure and tourism manager Nick Thornley both think the plans will boost tourism and provide employment.

The Golden Cap and Alberion parks was bought in 1978 and 1987 .

Mr Cox said the park operates well below its potential.

He added: “Golden Cap’s location and the old-fashioned bucket and spade holiday are no longer sufficient attractions for the park to compete in today’s highly competitive tourism industry.”

But objectors say it will do nothing for residents but bring more traffic and pollution.

Visitor Richard Pring said: “I was shocked to learn that this incredibly beautiful part of the Dorset coast could be further spoilt.

Eleanor Petrie from Chideock said it would ‘threaten the survival of many small local businesses’.

Roger Carey of Chideock said it would be a ‘blot on the landscape’.

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

9:34pm Sat 10 Nov 12

outsidelookinin says...

So visitors in the area for an extra three months spending their money in the area is bad news as is the extra employment on a site that is already there.At least it will get rid of the touring caravans blocking the roads.Just a thought
So visitors in the area for an extra three months spending their money in the area is bad news as is the extra employment on a site that is already there.At least it will get rid of the touring caravans blocking the roads.Just a thought outsidelookinin
  • Score: 0

2:10pm Sun 11 Nov 12

westendcat says...

Why don't people object to the Poundbury development - that was always in an AONB - WDDC planners are two faced.
WDDC's Director of Planning has an awful lot to answer for.
Why don't people object to the Poundbury development - that was always in an AONB - WDDC planners are two faced. WDDC's Director of Planning has an awful lot to answer for. westendcat
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree