Boy, 11, punched on way to school (From Dorset Echo)

While such an attack is repugnant regardless of gender, I suspect if a man had punched a small female child the entire Dorset Police force would be out and headlines abound for days.

When she is found it will be interesting to see if one, her face is published in the paper as a man's would undoubtedly be, two, if the law is applied to the same level of treatment and punishment as a man would get for the same crime.

Lets hope she is found.

'Spect she'd had a gutful of kids pushing n shoving her, no excuse though.

I was working on Portland in June and caught the same bus as a lot of the school children from Royal Manor. they were always polite, helpful to each other and a pleasure to travel with. I think this woman should try and be a bit more understanding when the bus is busy and she loses her "personal space" for a few minutes. I have nothing but respect for these students, they are a credit to their school.

Cecil needs a woman in his life!

stench wrote:
Cecil needs a woman in his life!

one that'd knock some sense into him :D

ladygodiva wrote:
I was working on Portland in June and caught the same bus as a lot of the school children from Royal Manor. they were always polite, helpful to each other and a pleasure to travel with. I think this woman should try and be a bit more understanding when the bus is busy and she loses her "personal space" for a few minutes. I have nothing but respect for these students, they are a credit to their school.

I must say that some time back I had to use a bus from Wyke to Portland and while a small handful of students were rather rude and ignorant, I was very pleased to see the responsible attitudes of quite a number of them. One young girl even having a go at another student reminding them of how the School has told them members of public (non students) must be allowed on the bus first and not to shove and push.Sadly the small group was so bad the driver had to stop everyone getting on for a while.

It was quite uplifting though to see someone so young act responsible and thoughtful like that for a change. A reminder to those bad ones in the group what shame they bring on the rest.

stench wrote:

stench wrote:
Cecil needs a woman in his life!

one that'd knock some sense into him :D

I wonder if Cecil knows anyone who "slaps" kids!

woodsedge wrote:

stench wrote:

stench wrote:
Cecil needs a woman in his life!

one that'd knock some sense into him :D

I wonder if Cecil knows anyone who "slaps" kids!

I don't know it was commenter James young you was accusing of that, aside from dozens of other accusations, hate speeches and feminist spittle on other articles. Seeing as you have spent dozens of comments claiming to represent these women and women's groups on other threads I will leave the public to see you for what you are.

cecilbdoomil wrote:
While such an attack is repugnant regardless of gender, I suspect if a man had punched a small female child the entire Dorset Police force would be out and headlines abound for days. When she is found it will be interesting to see if one, her face is published in the paper as a man's would undoubtedly be, two, if the law is applied to the same level of treatment and punishment as a man would get for the same crime. Lets hope she is found.

This really isn't the place to reignite your bickering regarding the oppression of men.

Let's spare a thought for the child and mother, rather than attempt to score points to our own ends.

Yes I agree. Lets spare a thought for the young boy assaulted by a woman.

RunRabbit wrote:

cecilbdoomil wrote:
While such an attack is repugnant regardless of gender, I suspect if a man had punched a small female child the entire Dorset Police force would be out and headlines abound for days. When she is found it will be interesting to see if one, her face is published in the paper as a man's would undoubtedly be, two, if the law is applied to the same level of treatment and punishment as a man would get for the same crime. Lets hope she is found.

This really isn't the place to reignite your bickering regarding the oppression of men.

Let's spare a thought for the child and mother, rather than attempt to score points to our own ends.

RunRabbit, you are right, I apologise for my earlier comment and hope the lad is not to affected by this incident.

cecildoomil it has become very clear you hate women.
You clearly have a big chip on your shoulder and i wouldn't mind betting a women has broken your heart hence the continuous anti-woman comments.
That is very obvious to anyone reading your comments throughout the various articles, which makes me for one..take not one bit of notice of your laughable comments seriously

weydiva wrote:
cecildoomil it has become very clear you hate women.
You clearly have a big chip on your shoulder and i wouldn't mind betting a women has broken your heart hence the continuous anti-woman comments.
That is very obvious to anyone reading your comments throughout the various articles, which makes me for one..take not one bit of notice of your laughable comments seriously

Oh Good heavens, do you think everytime someone makes an obseration about the female gender and the differences between the way they are treated or portrayed compared to men, often quite correctly, that they have to, "hate all women"?

Even I am getting fed up with hearing that kind of "feminist" response. If you must respond please do so with some intelligence.

Now you delete comments Echo? Tally has been kept ;-)

woodsedge wrote:

stench wrote:

stench wrote:
Cecil needs a woman in his life!

one that'd knock some sense into him :D

I wonder if Cecil knows anyone who "slaps" kids!

You really are a nasty piece of work aren't you. I slapped my son. No inverted comment needed. I slapped him because he was misbehaving and I want him to grow up to respect those around him. It's a world away from this incident. It's a shame that you continue to stoop so low when I volunteered the information merely to point out that in the case of domestic violence towards children, the law now counts cases which most people would not consider unreasonable. I'm not going to indulge in trading insults with you any further, but you could at least stick to the topic in hand.

Cecil and others...no more, please...

We have only heard one side to this story, we don’t have a view from the accused, and it seems witnesses are not abundant. Who knows what the reality is, even the echo are just alleging that this happened.

markerpen wrote:
Cecil and others...no more, please...

We have only heard one side to this story, we don’t have a view from the accused, and it seems witnesses are not abundant. Who knows what the reality is, even the echo are just alleging that this happened.

An interesting thought, I often study how many times people do not consider exactly that when the alleged perpetrator is a male ? One only has to peruse the comments on any newspaper to see the social conditioning as clear as a bell..

That aside, you are quite right though.

JamesYoung wrote:

woodsedge wrote:

stench wrote:

stench wrote:
Cecil needs a woman in his life!

one that'd knock some sense into him :D

I wonder if Cecil knows anyone who "slaps" kids!

You really are a nasty piece of work aren't you. I slapped my son. No inverted comment needed. I slapped him because he was misbehaving and I want him to grow up to respect those around him. It's a world away from this incident. It's a shame that you continue to stoop so low when I volunteered the information merely to point out that in the case of domestic violence towards children, the law now counts cases which most people would not consider unreasonable. I'm not going to indulge in trading insults with you any further, but you could at least stick to the topic in hand.

See how the feminist agenda and abuse industry works on peoples minds and thoughts?

It is a very nasty hate movement and this is why I confront it the way I do.

sandygunnel - have you read his comments on all the other articles?!! i am not saying what i said based on this article alone! do your research before commenting, did make me laugh though.
any article that contains a women in any way shape or form is followed by anti-women comments from him every time.

weydiva wrote:
sandygunnel - have you read his comments on all the other articles?!! i am not saying what i said based on this article alone! do your research before commenting, did make me laugh though.
any article that contains a women in any way shape or form is followed by anti-women comments from him every time.

Yes I have along with the several others who also supported the points being made, including women who's opinions agreed with them also being verbally attacked.

I have not seen any "women hating" comments as you falsley imply, but I have seen plenty of spiteful comments and other inflamatory/accusato
ry language from the few like yourself.

Any intelligent person without a vested interest or who is not folowing some rabid indoctrine or ideology would see that to.

if I feel he was saying anything that is a blatant lie or outright sexist, I will tell him so myself. I don't need some ranting feminist claiming to speak for me thank you. I have my own mind.

Sandygunnel wrote:

weydiva wrote:
sandygunnel - have you read his comments on all the other articles?!! i am not saying what i said based on this article alone! do your research before commenting, did make me laugh though.
any article that contains a women in any way shape or form is followed by anti-women comments from him every time.

Yes I have along with the several others who also supported the points being made, including women who's opinions agreed with them also being verbally attacked.

I have not seen any "women hating" comments as you falsley imply, but I have seen plenty of spiteful comments and other inflamatory/accusato

ry language from the few like yourself.

Any intelligent person without a vested interest or who is not folowing some rabid indoctrine or ideology would see that to.

if I feel he was saying anything that is a blatant lie or outright sexist, I will tell him so myself. I don't need some ranting feminist claiming to speak for me thank you. I have my own mind.

Uhoh.
I fear, sir, that you are about to join us in the stocks.

JamesYoung wrote:

Sandygunnel wrote:

weydiva wrote:
sandygunnel - have you read his comments on all the other articles?!! i am not saying what i said based on this article alone! do your research before commenting, did make me laugh though.
any article that contains a women in any way shape or form is followed by anti-women comments from him every time.

Yes I have along with the several others who also supported the points being made, including women who's opinions agreed with them also being verbally attacked.

I have not seen any "women hating" comments as you falsley imply, but I have seen plenty of spiteful comments and other inflamatory/accusato


ry language from the few like yourself.

Any intelligent person without a vested interest or who is not folowing some rabid indoctrine or ideology would see that to.

if I feel he was saying anything that is a blatant lie or outright sexist, I will tell him so myself. I don't need some ranting feminist claiming to speak for me thank you. I have my own mind.

Uhoh.
I fear, sir, that you are about to join us in the stocks.

I think I would prefer Ma'm?.

I am not moved in the slightest by those who think that personal attacks, snidey insinuations or outright falsehood are a replacement for reasoned debate when they don't get their way.

Sandygunnel wrote:

JamesYoung wrote:

Sandygunnel wrote:

weydiva wrote:
sandygunnel - have you read his comments on all the other articles?!! i am not saying what i said based on this article alone! do your research before commenting, did make me laugh though.
any article that contains a women in any way shape or form is followed by anti-women comments from him every time.

Yes I have along with the several others who also supported the points being made, including women who's opinions agreed with them also being verbally attacked.

I have not seen any "women hating" comments as you falsley imply, but I have seen plenty of spiteful comments and other inflamatory/accusato



ry language from the few like yourself.

Any intelligent person without a vested interest or who is not folowing some rabid indoctrine or ideology would see that to.

if I feel he was saying anything that is a blatant lie or outright sexist, I will tell him so myself. I don't need some ranting feminist claiming to speak for me thank you. I have my own mind.

Uhoh.
I fear, sir, that you are about to join us in the stocks.

I think I would prefer Ma'm?.

I am not moved in the slightest by those who think that personal attacks, snidey insinuations or outright falsehood are a replacement for reasoned debate when they don't get their way.

My apologies. Ma'am!

At least in this day & age this sort of headline is newsworthy.

In my day it was a running gauntlet to get to school.