Weymouth holiday park gains approval for 'safari-type' holiday village

Dorset Echo: HOW IT WOULD LOOK: A photomontage of one of the safari tents being planned by Waterside Holiday Park HOW IT WOULD LOOK: A photomontage of one of the safari tents being planned by Waterside Holiday Park

A WEYMOUTH holiday park has been given permission to build a safari-type tourism village that will target the 'glamping' market.

The Waterside Holiday Group has plans for high-spec safari tent holiday accommodation as part of its site at Bowleaze Cove.

The tents will replace 74 touring caravan and motorhome pitches in the north eastern corner of the park.

'Glamping' combines camping with luxury amenities. The three-bedroom tents include mod cons such as a dishwasher and a shower and are constructed on timber platforms.

Weymouth and Portland Borough Council's planning and traffic committee met on Wednesday to discuss the proposal.

Planning officer Chris Moscrop authored a report recommending the application's approval.

The proposal was met with local opposition however by the Sutton Poyntz Society.

The Society argued there would be a negative impact on the Dorset AONB and Jordan Valley.

The tents will stay up all year round but the applicant said this would have less impact on the landscape than caravans.

Speaking to councillors on Wednesday, Bill Egerton, secretary of the Sutton Poyntz Society, said: “When our committee considered this application we concluded that the applicant's visual impact report had underestimated the impact of these tents particularly in the winter when the site traditionally is empty.

“When you view it from a distance, the roofs all merged into a single mass, just like the roofs of the caravans.”

Applications in the past have included putting static holiday caravans on the same site.

These were refused by the council due to the effect on the surrounding countryside.

Richard Burgess, representing The Waterside Holiday Park, told the committee the proposal was a sustainable development with no policy objections to it.

He said: “It has economic advantages and has landscape advantages. The officer's report addressed the issues accurately and professionally.”

Mayor Ray Banham , a committee member, said he would be voting against the application.

He said: “The objective is to encourage people to this borough as it's a family oriented place.

“In my mind we are taking away the family from that because they can't afford that and will go elsewhere.”

Cllr Kevin Hodder said he was indifferent to the application when reading the report.

After visiting the site however he was surprised to see how well screened existing tents were.

He said: “The only objection that you could have for it is the fact that it is a permanent structure rather than a mobile white touring structure.”

After hearing each committee member's view, the majority voted in favour of the application.

Speaking after the decision, Mr Egerton said it was a 'difficult case' for the planning and traffic committee to deal with but he wasn't surprised by the outcome.

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

5:29pm Wed 14 May 14

Schrodinger's Cat says...

Isn't Ray Banham missing the point? People who can't afford "glamping" will still be able to find affordable accommodation in the area, so there's no reason why they should go elsewhere. More importantly, this new type of accommodation ADDS to what is already here and should, hopefully, attract new holidaymakers who haven't been here before. And if they're a bit wealthier they might spend a bit more money in our shops, cafes and restaurants :-)
Isn't Ray Banham missing the point? People who can't afford "glamping" will still be able to find affordable accommodation in the area, so there's no reason why they should go elsewhere. More importantly, this new type of accommodation ADDS to what is already here and should, hopefully, attract new holidaymakers who haven't been here before. And if they're a bit wealthier they might spend a bit more money in our shops, cafes and restaurants :-) Schrodinger's Cat
  • Score: 13

6:24pm Wed 14 May 14

Mango man says...

Poor mans Center Parcs by the looks of it
Poor mans Center Parcs by the looks of it Mango man
  • Score: -14

9:41pm Wed 14 May 14

popsiebabes says...

The Sutton Poyntz Society I see put forward their usual pathetic argument against someone trying to improve things for Weymouth as a resort. But then again most of the villagers see themselves more akin to Dorchester than Weymouth as it is just a bit more high brow.
The trouble with that group of ancient revolutionaries is that they allow themselves to get taken over by a bunch of outsiders who move to the village when they retire from their civil service jobs and then start poking their nose in everyone elses business. The real villagers have their voice taken away.
The Sutton Poyntz Society I see put forward their usual pathetic argument against someone trying to improve things for Weymouth as a resort. But then again most of the villagers see themselves more akin to Dorchester than Weymouth as it is just a bit more high brow. The trouble with that group of ancient revolutionaries is that they allow themselves to get taken over by a bunch of outsiders who move to the village when they retire from their civil service jobs and then start poking their nose in everyone elses business. The real villagers have their voice taken away. popsiebabes
  • Score: 5

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree