Report this comment
  • "Miss O'Callaghan led the transfer of pathology services to Serco while Chief Executive at Bedford Hospital in 2010, leaving for Dorchester before the full horror of the implications were discovered. "The takeover of the NHS's biggest pathology laboratories by a consortium led by the multinational Serco was followed by a series of clinical and financial failures and saw London hospitals being forced to lend money to the company" reported The Guardian. Now history is repeating itself as Miss O'Callagan is leaving Dorset County Hospital having set in motion the conroversial move away from inhouse pathology to a new cheaper provider. See www.theguardian.com/

    society/2012/sep/30/

    pathology-labs-takeo

    ver-failures
    and www.corporatewatch.o

    rg/news/2012/sep/29/

    transforming-patholo

    gy-serco-way
    The major problem at Dorset County Hospital- I used to work there- is the huge number of overpaid directors, managers and hangerson who issue strings of edicts and targets to low paid staff, as a means of justifying their own jobs. The ratio of managers to real workers is quite amazing."
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Fears pathology services could be moved from Dorset County Hospital

Jean O’Callaghan, chief executive of Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Jean O’Callaghan, chief executive of Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

First published in News Dorset Echo: Photograph of the Author by , Senior Reporter

HEALTH campaigners say they are concerned pathology services could be moved away from Dorset County Hospital.

Organisers of the recently formed Dorset Health Campaign say they are concerned a current tendering project for the Dorchester hospital could lead to pathology services being shipped out to a private company with a loss of local jobs.

However, hospital bosses say if the current services at DCH are found to be the best, the service will stay at the hospital and that whatever happens with the process, essential pathology services will remain on site.

A report to Dorset County Council’s Dorset Health Scrutiny Committee on May 23, stated that the aims of the project were: using a tender process, to compare our pathology services against other interested providers to determine if DCH is providing the best-value service and use the outcomes to inform a decision on the future provision of the service.

Out of a total of 29 interested parties, four have been selected to go forward to the next stage of procurement – these are a mixture of NHS and private organisations.

The report states: “The existing internally delivered pathology service has not tendered for this service. The trust has used the pathology staff’s expertise to produce specification documents and evaluate supplier responses.

“This precludes them from bidding themselves. The internal service will be benchmarked against the service specification and costs.

“The internal service will then be compared against the best potential supplier from the tender process. This will inform the final decision.”

Hospital bosses said that no decision has yet been made but if there is a new provider of pathology services, staff would be protected under employment law.

The final decision of the future of the pathology service is expected in September.

A founder member of the group, Sally Cooke, said they had questions about the future quality of the service. She said: “How do we know the public will still get a good, timely, and high quality service if the path lab should go private? And what redress is there if a private provider delivers a poor service? We are concerned about the loss of local employment and skills.”

Jean O’Callaghan, chief executive of Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust said that nationally there was a move towards centralising pathology services rather than having a full pathology service in every hospital.

She said: “Quality standard requirements are much higher now for laboratory services and it is difficult for smaller centres like ours to keep up with these, to invest in the latest equipment and to recruit the necessary staff.

“At the heart of this project is a commitment to ensuring our patients are receiving the very best pathology services and, whatever the outcome of this process is, essential pathology services will remain on site. The hospital could not function otherwise.

“We will use the outcome of the tender process to inform a decision on the future provision of the services. This decision will be made by the Trust Board.”

She added: “If the project demonstrates that our own in-house services are the best then we will retain those services.”

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree