The postal executive of the Communication Workers Union will meet to discuss any progress made during talks with the Royal Mail aimed at breaking a deadlocked row over jobs, pay and modernisation.
The two sides have been locked in negotiations for the past two days after agreeing to meet under the chairmanship of TUC general secretary Brendan Barber.
The union’s postal executive was briefed by CWU negotiators while Royal Mail chief executive Adam Crozier was given details of the talks by managing director Mark Higson who is leading the management team.
Up to 120,000 CWU members staged two 24-hour walkouts last week, which delayed more than 30 million items of mail.
A similar number of workers are due to strike on Thursday, Friday and Saturday, threatening fresh disruption to deliveries.
The union has announced that 43,700 staff in mail centres as well as drivers and garage staff will strike on Thursday, 400 workers in Plymouth, Stockport and Stoke dealing with badly addressed mail will strike on Friday, and 77,000 delivery and collection staff will walk out on Saturday.
Mr Barber described yesterday’s talks as "useful", adding that further work was being done overnight to try to reach an agreement.
The TUC leader was involved in drawing up a deal which ended the last national post strike two years ago.
Meanwhile the CWU has threatened to go to the High Court to stop Royal Mail from hiring agency workers to help cope with industrial action.
Last week Royal Mail announced it would hire 30,000 temporary workers to clear the backlog in post created by earlier local action.
The union is seeking legal advice over whether this could be in breach of the Conduct of Employment Agencies and Employment Businesses regulations, which make it illegal for temporary workers to be used to undertake the work of striking employees.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article