News RSS Feed


Pointing prompts council to act

11:35am Tuesday 19th August 2008

comment Comments (13)   Have your say »


COUNCILLORS will decide whether to take action against a former colleague over unauthorised alterations to her Grade-II listed home.

A report by Weymouth and Portland Borough Council says "unauthorised and inappropriate" stonework and pointing elements have been added to 12 High Street, Wyke Regis.

Part of the property, which is the home of former borough councillor Kate Wheller and her husband Michael, is thought to date back to Tudor times.

A report by the council's planning, economy and development services manager, Simon Williams, says the Whellers carried out structural repairs to the building's underlying masonry "without the benefit of consultation with the planning unit and/or the necessary listed building consent."

It is the second time the Whellers have faced action for making the unauthorised changes to the property.

In September 2005 councillors voted to allow the changes, already made to the property by the Whellers without prior consultation, to remain in place.

Mr Williams' latest report said that last August "the applicant had provided assurances that work to correct the unauthorised elements would commence shortly."

He said this included getting the building's mortar analysed so it could be properly matched in future works.

Mr Williams added: "This has not been done and at the time of finalising this report no further correspondence from the applicant has been received."

The report said officers had tried contacting the couple on numerous occasions to discuss the building before making the application to serve an enforcement notice.

Mrs Wheller said she and her husband were "really surprised" by a letter they received from the council threatening an enforcement notice on the property.

She said: "This is a listed property and the council have paid no attention to it at all for years while it deteriorated.

"The planning committee at the council previously said they thought the building looked better after the work we've had done."

Mrs Wheller added that she and her husband had received no correspondence from the council on the issue before last November and that they were "anxious" to get the situation resolved.

She added: "They take ages to respond to our letters. They demand responses from us immediately but they've taken months to get back to us."

The borough council's planning and traffic committee will decide tomorrow whether to serve a notice against the Whellers to reverse the changes made to the property.


Your Say YourDorset Echo

Ask Archie, Weymouth says...
1:08pm Tue 19 Aug 08

She added: "They take ages to respond to our letters. They demand responses from us immediately but they've taken months to get back to us."
The same as they would sooner see these old buildings go into dis-repair and fall down rather than let remedial repairs be carried out.All these old building are like they are because generations of people have repaired and altered them.Why should planners today deceide natural develpment should stop.

Dave S, Weymouth says...
1:40pm Tue 19 Aug 08

Ask Archie wrote:
She added: "They take ages to respond to our letters. They demand responses from us immediately but they've taken months to get back to us."
The same as they would sooner see these old buildings go into dis-repair and fall down rather than let remedial repairs be carried out.All these old building are like they are because generations of people have repaired and altered them.Why should planners today deceide natural develpment should stop.
Like the Old Town Hall the Council is supposed to be maintaining!

Ask Archie, Weymouth says...
2:09pm Tue 19 Aug 08

Like the Old Town Hall the Council is supposed to be maintaining!
Exactly my point.Thanks Dave S

RadipoleHalt, Radipole! says...
5:25pm Tue 19 Aug 08

The borough council's planning and traffic committee will decide tomorrow whether to serve a notice against the Whellers to reverse the changes made to the property.
So that'll be to remove the pointing and remedial stonework - that'll work then!!

Scolopax, Wyke Regis says...
5:45pm Tue 19 Aug 08

Before the Whellers moved in, the property was rendered, suggest replace the rendering and the pointing is no longer an issue. I also take issue with Mrs Whellers comment regarding the property having 'deteriorated' the previous occupant was a very good friend and extermely profficient in such matters. Perhaps correct to say that things may not have been to her taste .

bluecat, Weymouth says...
6:13pm Tue 19 Aug 08

Well said Dave. Who is going to issue an enforcement notice to remove the plastic rain pipes etc etc on the old town hall.

tiger, preston says...
9:23pm Tue 19 Aug 08

Will Mr. Williams issue an enforcement notice on the Council to repair the 24 concrete chalets at Greenhill or as bluecat points out, the old Town Hall??
All of us correspondants have good ideas but does any councillor or council officer read them?? They certainly take no notice of any of these comments.
It seems that the forte of a succession of W & P councillors has been to let the areas attractions deteriorate but rake in ever increasing amounts of money.

pachyderm, tea & buns sub-committee secretary says...
10:05pm Tue 19 Aug 08

The borough council's planning and traffic committee will decide
I know High St is narrow, but what's it got to do with traffic??

mac, portland says...
10:41pm Tue 19 Aug 08

we have a x councillor in wyke flouting planning regs another in portland (trade croft)and the house belonging to another in a discusting state in portland road ,, !councillors!

Ask Archie, Weymouth says...
7:47am Wed 20 Aug 08

and the house belonging to another in a discusting state in portland road ,, !councillors!
Let's name and shame. If Anne Kenwood cared about "her" ward surely she would not have old cars a falling down garage and overgrown garden near the traffic lights on Portland road.At least the Portland councillor is on Tradecroft and not an eyesore to visitors or locals passing by.

Weymouth Mouth., Weymouth says...
12:44pm Wed 20 Aug 08

Ask Archie wrote:
and the house belonging to another in a discusting state in portland road ,, !councillors!
Let's name and shame. If Anne Kenwood cared about "her" ward surely she would not have old cars a falling down garage and overgrown garden near the traffic lights on Portland road.At least the Portland councillor is on Tradecroft and not an eyesore to visitors or locals passing by.
That's rather a cheap shot. So you're saying that because she might not've cut her grass, she must be less passionate about her ward than somebody who had a 'neat' garden? Perhaps people would be less inclined to jump on the 'hate the council' bandwagon if all the councillors were forced to have garden gnomes and a fishpond.

Ask Archie, Weymouth says...
3:35pm Wed 20 Aug 08

Weymouth Mouth.Not a cheap shot just an example of one rule for councillors one rule for everyone else.The property in question in wyke has been well maintained but the resedents are in trouble over a bit of pointing where as because the Portland Rd property is not listed it can be allowed to look tatty and uncared for.

Weymouth Mouth., Weymouth says...
5:43pm Wed 20 Aug 08

I would say this story demonstrates quite the opposite; ex coun. Kate Wheller hasn't receieved any kind of preferential treatment despite having been on the council. And the property you describe as being tatty and uncared for is not a listed building, and therefore it is up to the owner to maintain it, or not as the case may be, just like any other buliding that is not protected.

Comments are closed on this article.

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »