News RSS Feed


EXPENSES ROW: MP Jim Knight claimed £900 life insurance


SOUTH Dorset MP Jim Knight has had to repay over £900 in wrongfully claimed parliamentary expenses for life insurance.

Receipts published online for the first time yesterday showed Mr Knight submitted an expenses form in May that included a payment to insurers Friends Provident.

He said the form was returned to him with a handwritten note next to the claim for £36.41, saying: ‘Life ins? Not allowable. To be looked into further, re: previous claim’.

Mr Knight said that after he was told he could not claim for life insurance he wrote a cheque for over £900, payable to Parliament, to repay around three years’ worth of monthly life insurance claims he had made.

He was also able to claim for his TV licence up until June of this year.

Mr Knight – who earns more than £100,000 a year – said he submitted the claims because having a life insurance policy was a condition of him getting a 100 per cent mortgage on his ministerial flat in London.

He added: “It was deemed that this was something I was not able to claim for and I have since repaid the amount to Parliament.

“I can’t recall the exact figure but it would have been at least £900 I would have had to repay.”

Mr Knight said he repaid it in May or June of this year.

He added that he claimed the expenses because he saw it as part of his overall mortgage claim, adding: “I felt it was part of the deal for my second home.

“It was an expense I would not have had to claim if I did not have to have a second home in London.”

Mr Knight has an MP’s salary of £63,291 but he receives an additional £39,893 as a minister – a total of £103,184.

Mr Knight’s expenses paperwork for the first quarter of this financial year also showed he has claimed £105 for washing machine repairs and has had a claim for £25 towards a phone bill refused.

Mr Knight has come under fire for making the life insurance expenses claims. The deputy chairman of Weymouth and Portland Residents Association, Eric Alley said he had to pay for his own life insurance when he owned a flat in London while working for the Home Office.

He added: “Everybody’s had to go through these things but not everybody would think that they could put in a claim for that.

“Jim certainly shouldn’t have claimed that in the first place, but it goes in his favour that he has now paid it back.”

The Taxpayers’ Alliance said that Mr Knight was wrong to try and claim the money for life insurance.

Spokesman Matthew Elliott said: “Having life insurance is a luxury of personal benefit to your family, not something essential to doing the job of an MP at all.

“So there is no way he should have asked taxpayers to pick up this bill.

“It may be the case that the bank refused to give him a mortgage without one, but in that case he should have rented or looked for a more affordable property.”

Liberal Democrat parliamentary candidate for South Dorset Ros Kayes said she felt Mr Knight’s claim was ‘borderline.’ She added: “It’s not like MPs paying to have duck houses in the middle of their ponds or having the pipes underneath their tennis courts repaired.

“I would say this would have been more difficult for him to judge.”

Mrs Kayes added that it was the kind of expense MPs should ‘pay more attention to’ from now on.

Conservative parliamentary candidate for South Dorset, Richard Drax, said: “I really have nothing to say about this other than I’m just getting on with my job and I’m looking forward to the day of the next general election.”

Comments(18)

Duckorange says...
10:24am Fri 11 Dec 09

It's hardly a duck house, is it?

shy talk says...
11:54am Fri 11 Dec 09

In the event that a MP sells their second home, who as taxpayers we have partly contributed to their running cost. Does any or part of the profit made be returned to the public purse? And is any allowance given to MP’s for capital gains tax?

Peddle Power says...
12:39pm Fri 11 Dec 09

Another corrupt MP milking the system. Surely if he was unaware that he couldn't make the claim then he's the wrong guy to represent us.
I'll say goodbye now because you won't be there after the election.

biggestoaf says...
1:29pm Fri 11 Dec 09

If this money was paid back in the summer why is it a story now?

Peddle Power - I don't see how you can make an accusation of corruption. Presumably the reason he thought he could make a claim was because the system was so unclear - the claims had been accepted by the finance office for three years before they turned around to point out that life assurance could not be claimed for.

Also, before you assume Mr Knight will not be re-elected you should take a look at the result of yesterday's by-election in Wyke Regis - a Labour gain from the Conservatives.

popup says...
3:25pm Fri 11 Dec 09

Peddle Power wrote:
Another corrupt MP milking the system. Surely if he was unaware that he couldn't make the claim then he's the wrong guy to represent us. I'll say goodbye now because you won't be there after the election.
It would seem to me that rather than being corrupt he is simply the victim of a very poor system that was introduced by the Tories and left wide open to the extent they were actually encouraged to claim for anything and everything as a way of giving them a pay rise without the electorate knowing so may i suggest that rather than stand on that soap box you get inside it. I also think your goodbye is rather premature.

nigefromdorchester says...
3:55pm Fri 11 Dec 09

SOUTH Dorset MP Jim Knight .......

Only for another 4 months !!!!!

And then someone else can pay for his life insurance

Leccy says...
3:58pm Fri 11 Dec 09

Another non story. If the Echo want to dig up dirt why not look back a lot further and see who had their noses in the trough in the past governments,it's not a new thing.

popup says...
4:58pm Fri 11 Dec 09

nigefromdorchester wrote:
SOUTH Dorset MP Jim Knight ....... Only for another 4 months !!!!! And then someone else can pay for his life insurance
I wouldn’t count you chickens just yet as D.C does not seem to want to win.

free wessex says...
5:05pm Fri 11 Dec 09

Richard Grosvenor Plunkett-Ernle-Erle-
Drax is an old Etonian and lives in an Elizabethan mansion set in more than 7,000 acres.
What no duck house?

franchise says...
5:05pm Fri 11 Dec 09

biggestoaf, there is a so called Green Book and JK was reminded to read it by the remuneration office.(If you care to read all the expenses) One should read the actual expenses which leave a lot to be desired. One mistake after another. There is also the question of CT (belatedly so called corrected) and cleaning, questionable and food., not to mention office staff etc.,
It may have always been taken advantage of but with over £100.000 it begs the question of an individual's moral and ethical standards.
This goes for every MP. Just because others do it, there is no excuse for cheating and one is left with one's own conscience.
There are quite a few who are honest and didn't take advantage of this system. JK does not belong to them. With his expenses he is on an average about 300th to 400th in the list which is about average. Not honest, not dishonest but comfortably swimming with the tide.
With regard to his goodbye being premature. This voting system is so unfair. No matter who you vote for
this system will inevitably not produce the overall winner and due to the fact that Weymouth has a huge proportion of welfare recipients
this is always extremely good for Labour. I shall be interested to see next year exactly how many people have voted. The voters are getting
fewer and fewer. Don't forget Labour got in in the last election with the lowest percentage of votes for years.

CoogarUK.com says...
9:11pm Fri 11 Dec 09

I hope he's maintained an adequate level of cover from his own pocket.

Tru belle says...
9:43am Sat 12 Dec 09

Vituperation is a primitive reponse, it makes ugly reading.

Looking at the Dorchester responses, I thought Oliver Letwin was your MP or don't you know?

Mads says...
10:09am Sat 12 Dec 09

Indeed, the expenses for tennis court repairs made by Oliver Letwin were far more questionnable - http://www.telegraph
.co.uk/news/newstopi
cs/mps-expenses/5305
385/Oliver-Letwins-t
ennis-court-repairs-
MPs-expenses.html

bluecat says...
10:11am Sat 12 Dec 09

Seems like a borderline case and a genuine mistake.

585 says...
11:44am Sat 12 Dec 09

bluecat, Weymouth
What is the difference between a 'genuine mistake', an ordinary mistake and failing to read (or ignoring) the Green Book?

Bluelady says...
11:51am Sat 12 Dec 09

shy talk wrote:
In the event that a MP sells their second home, who as taxpayers we have partly contributed to their running cost. Does any or part of the profit made be returned to the public purse? And is any allowance given to MP’s for capital gains tax?
Shy talk, I have been asking the same question. If we the taxpayer is making a contribution towards these second homes for MP's then surely any profits made on the sale of them should come back into the public purse!

This story a bit like the Portland Mayor but he was arrested for his supposedly actions!

pd7 says...
12:42pm Sat 12 Dec 09

I think i prefer a nose in the trough rather than a head in a laptop looking at mucky pics.

giveusthefacts says...
1:25am Sun 13 Dec 09

If the Taxpayer was to meet the cost of his life insurance, would we be the named beneficiaries on the policy?


Jim Knight has repayed £900 Jim Knight has repayed £900

Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses