News RSS Feed


Dorset's message to climate conference


DORSET may be hundreds of miles from Denmark but campaigners hope they were able to send a message to decision-makers at the Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen.

A vigil in Weymouth town centre was one of many held round the world to demonstrate to leaders attending the conference that people want a real climate deal.

Weymouth and Portland Transition Town (TT) group organised the event in the town and it was attended by about 30 people which included local politicians and members of Greenpeace.

They held up banners which said ‘Climate Change – Fair, Ambitious Binding Treaty’ and ‘Climate Change – The World Needs a Real Deal’.

The global vigil was promoted by the internet campaigning group Avaaz.org which said that 3,000 events took place in more than 130 different countries.

The two-week UN conference in the Danish capital aimed to thrash out a global deal on climate change although many were disappointed by the outcomes.

Weymouth and Portland TT secretary David Smith said: “We had a successful event in Weymouth and we can only hope that people were listening to us.

“We read out the declaration before marching through the town centre.”

The declaration which was read out says that the fragile balance of the Earth is changing and global warming could be beyond our control in five years.

It says the decisions we make today will decide the future of humanity and we should stop burning oil, coal and wood and shift to the natural energy of the sun, wind and water.


Your Say YourEcho

585, Weymouth says...
8:31am Tue 22 Dec 09

It has been very cool in Weymouth this week, there have been lots of arctic weather on the continent, there have been enormous snow storms in parts of America, the current temperature in Ottawa is -16 C. It has been disclosed that 'scientists' have been selective over which part of temperature readings from Russia they use. The Prince of Wales ramps up a carbon footprint of 2,601 tons while telling us that Western capitalist excess is destroying the planet. Dr. Rajendra Pachauri, the railroad engineer who heads the International Panel on Climate Change and has demanded that “hefty aviation taxes should be introduced to deter people from flying,” flew 443,226 miles on “IPCC business” in the year and a half before the Copenhagen summit. And Al Gore is a carbon billionaire: He makes more money buying offsets from himself than his dad did from investing in Occidental Petroleum. So whats with the 'global warming'?

Tremendous Eddie Tremendouson, Weymouth says...
8:39am Tue 22 Dec 09

Bit cold isn't it?

Climategate anyone?

CO2 as a driver of the climate? Scientific Consensus? Don't make me laugh!

Open your to eyes to what is happening:

http://wattsupwithth
at.com/

http://www.thegwpf.o
rg/

http://www.copenhage
nclimatechallenge.or
g/index.php?option=c
om_content&view=fron
tpage&Itemid=1

free wessex, Bridport says...
8:49am Tue 22 Dec 09

Inevitable we human beings are the next dinosaurs

Weston7, Portland says...
9:05am Tue 22 Dec 09

Amazing! 30 people holding banners changed the world, even without the usual bongo drums and face paint.
(My key words: "heat-soon"!!)

popup, portland says...
9:39am Tue 22 Dec 09

Climate change or global warming or whatever the next name will be for a natural occurrence, man has and will always fail in its attempts to change nature, they will spend billions of our money on a futile exercise trying to change the inevitable. Instead of trying to change our weather it would be better to learn how to live with it, because no matter what we do whatever restrictions we impose on ourselves all we are going to do is spend billions on making our lives miserable. It would be interesting to know how many people think we can change the world’s climate because i suspect that when it comes to collecting the billions of pounds from Joe public in the form of even greater taxation so that we can give what has been promised to the poorer nation’s people might not be so keen.

Mabu, Dorchester says...
9:50am Tue 22 Dec 09

Climate change has been proved being reasonable doubt, to be due to humans' CO2 emissions. The vast amounts of scientists agree and with stakes so high it's irresponsible to ignore this. Yes, it's cold, that's why they dropped 'global warming' for climate change, it was seen as ambiguous. In between your cynical pub-logic comments, spare a thought for a few million in Africa and entire Asian-island communities who are suffering already.

TurnerDigital, Towcester says...
9:52am Tue 22 Dec 09

If the first I heard of it was reading i here then I doubt Obama knew much about it.

Tremendous Eddie Tremendouson, Weymouth says...
10:29am Tue 22 Dec 09

Mabu wrote:
Climate change has been proved being reasonable doubt, to be due to humans' CO2 emissions. The vast amounts of scientists agree and with stakes so high it's irresponsible to ignore this. Yes, it's cold, that's why they dropped 'global warming' for climate change, it was seen as ambiguous. In between your cynical pub-logic comments, spare a thought for a few million in Africa and entire Asian-island communities who are suffering already.
Nonsense!

CO2 levels lags the Earth's temperature by 800 years. Not the other way round.

Solar activity, water vapour, ocean currents, and the tilt of the Earth's axis have a much larger say in the Earth's varying climate.

And incidentally, just how much CO2 does mankind contribute to the overall level??? 3% is the answer. Just 3%. The assertion that we somehow control the climate is ludicrous and arrogance beyond belief.

We would be better off putting all our knowledge and technology into adapting to natural climatic variations and generally just cleaning up our act. Not wasting time, effort and vast sums of money into a futile attempt to control the climate.

King Canute springs to mind!

You won't see these referred to on the BBC but please check them out:

http://wattsupwithth

at.com/

http://www.thegwpf.o

rg/

http://www.copenhage

nclimatechallenge.or

g/index.php?option=c

om_content&view=fron

tpage&Itemid=1

Dorsetdumpling, Weymouth says...
2:26pm Tue 22 Dec 09

"...Beyond reasonable doubt", "...high stakes", "...irresponsible", "...cynical", "...pub logic", "...have a thought for those affected" - yees the usual litany we see in reply to anyone who dares question the dogma of global warming (- sorry, climate change).

Sorry Mabu - not convinced - this planet has been changing its climate for as long as it's had one. Humans have experienced it many times in the blink of the eye of time that we have been on this planet, and have either adapted, moved on, or died.

Whatever the real motives are for pressing to reduce carbon emissions, I suspect that concern for the planet is WAY down the list.

billyboi, Dorchester says...
4:22pm Tue 22 Dec 09

Dorsetdumpling wrote:
"...Beyond reasonable doubt", "...high stakes", "...irresponsible", "...cynical", "...pub logic", "...have a thought for those affected" - yees the usual litany we see in reply to anyone who dares question the dogma of global warming (- sorry, climate change). Sorry Mabu - not convinced - this planet has been changing its climate for as long as it's had one. Humans have experienced it many times in the blink of the eye of time that we have been on this planet, and have either adapted, moved on, or died. Whatever the real motives are for pressing to reduce carbon emissions, I suspect that concern for the planet is WAY down the list.
Ditto-and I think the motive for this is increased taxation

Mabu, Dorchester says...
5:01pm Tue 22 Dec 09

It is human nature to believe what is in our individual interests. Perhaps that's why people are reluctant to buy into the overwhelming evidence of man made climate change, because this is certainly the logical conclusion. Scientists rarely stick their heads out or exaggerate findings for limelight, as they face disgrace from their peers and lose credibility. And certainly not huge numbers of leading scientists on such big issues. Scientists work on facts, not taxes and not gut feeling (as is what influences us). We have to take their word for it or remain uncommitted. NOT trawl through the internet looking for the minority, biased climate change websites made by 4x4 drivers to make them feel better about themselves.....befor
e sitting down to grunt in agreement with Jeremy Clarkson. And you can substantiate anything you want, with Google.

Tremendous Eddie Tremendouson, Weymouth says...
6:01pm Tue 22 Dec 09

Okay, well try these for size:

http://www.timeshigh
ereducation.co.uk/st
ory.asp?sectioncode=
26&storycode=409454&
c=2

http://wattsupwithth
at.com/2009/12/22/st
udy-shows-cfcs-cosmi
c-rays-major-culprit
s-for-global-warming
/

http://www-eaps.mit.
edu/faculty/lindzen/
CV.pdf

http://arxiv.org/ftp
/arxiv/papers/0809/0
809.3762.pdf

http://en.wikipedia.
org/wiki/Global_Warm
ing_Petition_Project



Have you heard of the Global Warming Petition Project (Oregon Petition)? 31,000 scientists and engineers (over 9,000 holding Phd's) dispute the view of AGW. Hardly a consensus or what you might call "4x4 drivers"!


Sorry, but you are being led up the garden path by some very devious people with another agenda.

Get a grip, weymouth says...
6:09pm Tue 22 Dec 09

Let’s hope that they wrapped up warm, after all global warming can be bad.

Mabu, Dorchester says...
6:46pm Tue 22 Dec 09

I am not impressed by these links (or one CV)! It is a complex issue and therefore a case will always be made against it. 31,000 is still a minority. As a non-scientist I have to trust the majority as well as consider the risks. Until this changes climate change should and will be a big consideration for me.

billyboi, Dorchester says...
6:49pm Tue 22 Dec 09

Mabu wrote:
It is human nature to believe what is in our individual interests. Perhaps that's why people are reluctant to buy into the overwhelming evidence of man made climate change, because this is certainly the logical conclusion. Scientists rarely stick their heads out or exaggerate findings for limelight, as they face disgrace from their peers and lose credibility. And certainly not huge numbers of leading scientists on such big issues. Scientists work on facts, not taxes and not gut feeling (as is what influences us). We have to take their word for it or remain uncommitted. NOT trawl through the internet looking for the minority, biased climate change websites made by 4x4 drivers to make them feel better about themselves.....befor e sitting down to grunt in agreement with Jeremy Clarkson. And you can substantiate anything you want, with Google.
The logical conclusion not maybe the correct one and scientists have been known to be wrong and to announce findings under pressure of the Government of the day to support their policies. And yes I drive a 4x4 but I think you will find a large estate or saloon car emitts more CO2 so that's another myth you believe in. So why don't you take your holier than thou attitude and stick it where the sun doesn't shine (before that dies and the world ends anyway).

Mabu, Dorchester says...
7:52pm Tue 22 Dec 09

Billyboi, I posted to redress the balance in a one-sided set of comments re a controversial issue. If this upsets you, that's unfortunate. And I question all high polluting vehicles. Many 4x4's being an obvious example among them. I myself work in the oil and gas industry, in the design of large process plants and refineries. I have stood and watched the flaring of dirty byproducts for hours on end and the plumes of thick black smoke stretching for miles and becoming clouds - so I am not claiming higher ground! I am simply highlighting my concerns over climate change and the strong evidence that we as individuals contribute to it and therefore should act.

Tremendous Eddie Tremendouson, Weymouth says...
8:33pm Tue 22 Dec 09

Mabu wrote:
I am not impressed by these links (or one CV)! It is a complex issue and therefore a case will always be made against it. 31,000 is still a minority. As a non-scientist I have to trust the majority as well as consider the risks. Until this changes climate change should and will be a big consideration for me.
No one doubts naturally varying climatactic change. But man's effort in all of it? Insignificant I am afraid.


And the person's CV is Professor Richard Lindzen of MIT. The foremost expert on atmospheric physics and author of over 200 papers. Was once part of the IPCC but resigned because of it increasing political bias and non-scientific methods. In fact it is not even a scientific body these days - it is a political body and as corrupt as you will ever get (as the recent Climategate and HadCRU scandal wil testify). Professor Lindzen is now a confirmed sceptic towards AGW.


One last one for you: http://www.telegraph
.co.uk/news/6847227/
Questions-over-busin
ess-deals-of-UN-clim
ate-change-guru-Dr-R
ajendra-Pachauri.htm
l

Nice bloke!

Won't say any more as this is obviously a faith issue with you and not a scientific one.

Mabu, Dorchester says...
8:58pm Tue 22 Dec 09

I suggest you view Climate Wars programs 1&2 on youtube. It seems very unbiased to me and may sway you.

billyboi, Dorchester says...
10:25pm Tue 22 Dec 09

Mabu wrote:
Billyboi, I posted to redress the balance in a one-sided set of comments re a controversial issue. If this upsets you, that's unfortunate. And I question all high polluting vehicles. Many 4x4's being an obvious example among them. I myself work in the oil and gas industry, in the design of large process plants and refineries. I have stood and watched the flaring of dirty byproducts for hours on end and the plumes of thick black smoke stretching for miles and becoming clouds - so I am not claiming higher ground! I am simply highlighting my concerns over climate change and the strong evidence that we as individuals contribute to it and therefore should act.
I think most sane people agree with cutting down on the amount of pollution the human race produce and the depletion of the earth's natural resources but I believe that climate change would occur without any help from us. Plus I think people believe these campaigners are preaching at us and that just puts alot of peoples backs up and then they just dig their heels in.

theonewhoistall, weymouth says...
10:38am Wed 23 Dec 09

Right, I think everyone has a point.

We are fairly insignificant to the earth in the grand scheme of things and climatic changes happen on huge cycles beyond our comprehension as such short lived organisms.

We will inevitably die out or move on at some point and the planet will continue, to it we are at best a nasty rash...

However, lets take this opportunity to develop a fair, sustainable, clean and healthy way of living rather than treading grist through the mill and living in fear as the few in power have tricked most of us into doing...

If you want to free yourself check out Charlie Veitch "Everything is OK"

http://www.youtube.c
om/watch?v=qAQrsA3m8
Bg

and the Freeman of the land movement

Peace

Mabu, Dorchester says...
11:45am Wed 23 Dec 09

Charlie Veitch is an attention seeking anti-authority, anti-everything, wannabe-celebrity air-head. Seriously, take a look at Climate wars on youtube for scientific view from both sides of the argument.

Weston7, Portland says...
9:10pm Wed 23 Dec 09

Mabu wrote:
Charlie Veitch is an attention seeking anti-authority, anti-everything, wannabe-celebrity air-head. Seriously, take a look at Climate wars on youtube for scientific view from both sides of the argument.
He's also very funny. Great to see someone mocking the paranoids who think everyone is a peadophile or terrorist, and who try to stop innocent photos and filming in public places. Good for him if he helps redress the balance between legit safety and overbearing repression.

boner, says...
11:56am Thu 24 Dec 09

climate change is a creation of world leaders to enable them to tax the human race,yes the climate is changing & we should conserve resources but this a natural occurance not man made,when will more people stand up and let there voice be heard without feeling intimidated.

Mabu, Dorchester says...
12:44pm Thu 24 Dec 09

Youtube 'climate wars 2' (x6)

Comments are closed on this article.

David Smith and members of the Transition Town group at their climate change vigil David Smith and members of the Transition Town group at their climate change vigil

Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »