News RSS Feed


Dorchester charity campaigner's benefit warning


CHARITY campaigner Ian Stuart from Dorchester has warned people not to take benefit cuts lying down.

Former professor Mr Stuart, who suffers from a life-threatening brain condition, had his housing benefit cut from £90 to £63.

But after an appeal, and enquiries by the Dorset Echo, West Dorset District Council realised it had made a mistake.

Now Mr Stuart, aged 47, of St Helen’s Road, is warning others to challenge any cuts they may face.

He said: “It’s great news that they have reinstated the housing benefit.

“But it worries me that a precedent has been set that they can send these sort of cuts to people who are not in the position to be so proactive.

“There may be other people in the same situation.”

Mr Stuart has suffered from cavernoma, a condition where clusters of abnormal blood vessels are found in the brain, for nearly 25 years.

His housing benefit was cut by nearly a third from £90 to £63 but the council then reinstated and increased it to £92.30.

Mr Stuart was a professor of drama and spent a decade teaching at the University of Southern California in the United States.

He returned home eight years ago when his condition started getting worse, causing his hands to shake and affecting his speech.

He founded the Cavernoma Alliance UK charity.

He has warned that genuinely disabled people could suffer if the government goes ahead with a war on benefit cheats.

He accepted that the government needed to look at benefits and disability allowances in some situations but that a march on the disabled and infirm would be disastrous Mr Stuart said: “It is inevitable that there have to be cutbacks.

“But there are many people who are worthy of this money and entitled to it.

“People should not take it lying down.”

He added: “What about the situation where there is a family and the husband has a got a condition that is life threatening and they rely on the DLA for subsistence?”

Stuart Dawson, revenues and benefits manager, said: “We have investigated Mr Stuart’s case and will be writing to him to inform him that his benefit has increased to £400pcm, £92.30 per week, an increase on his original payment.

“We will be contacting Mr Stuart to apologise for the error.”

Comments(4)

CoogarUK.com says...
1:58am Fri 9 Jul 10

After reading the above article I remain at a loss as to how Mr Stuart's condition prevents him from working. If he can campaign for charity and be so proactive in getting his benefits reinstated then surely he is capable of getting a job. £400/month, eh? The mind boggles!

free wessex says...
10:15am Fri 9 Jul 10

And why wont this government go after with the same vigour the Tax dodgers who continually refuse to declare and pay tax? The owners of a daily newspaper who reside off-shore in the channel islands spring to mind amongst many.

echorubbish says...
2:06pm Fri 9 Jul 10

CoogarUK.com wrote:
After reading the above article I remain at a loss as to how Mr Stuart's condition prevents him from working. If he can campaign for charity and be so proactive in getting his benefits reinstated then surely he is capable of getting a job. £400/month, eh? The mind boggles!
Bit of a rash statement without knowing anything of the mans condition,I fully support the purge on benefit scroungers but you also have to remember there are a lot of people out there on benefits who deserve to be, there are also a lot of people out there on benefits who could do some work although they are not fully fit, but the problem is if there are a lot of unemployed fit people how do you expect somebody who is not 100% fit to get a job. The whole benefits system needs a good shake up right across the board, it won’t be popular but it needs to be done irrespective of the country’s economic problems. Years ago we used to give the disabled a little blue chariot (for want of a better word) and they were very grateful to have some mobility then they complained that they couldn’t take their families out with them so they came out with a scheme where they got a mobility allowance so now they can hand over that allowance and get a new car of their choice every three years and the only extra they have to pay for is fuel and this has got totally out of hand and needs to be seriously cut back, don’t get me wrong I have every sympathy for the genuinely disabled but their needs to be a much tougher regime in place as to who qualifies because you are talking about some serious money countrywide.

CoogarUK.com says...
6:36pm Fri 9 Jul 10

It should be clear to all that my statement was based purely on the information presented in the article (including the photograph). If you wish to describe it as 'rash' that is your prerogative. However, this gentleman receives an amount which probably equates to more than three times what one of his neighbours pays in council tax - Just towards his housing costs. Multiplying that kind of situation up a few times should provide a big clue as to why the country is almost bankrupt. The welfare system is in need (though I doubt will really get) a radical overhaul. For instance - generally speaking - entitlement does not necessarily equate to need. Further, I would have expected any professor who had worked until they were 40 to have built up at least a reasonable amount of resources of their own, had proper insurance, lower housing costs (i.e. A mortgage paid off or very low, plenty of equity) than someone in a less fortunate position than their own, etc. etc. Of course I am generalising, not seeking out to intimidate one individual in any way.


Ian Stuart with letters from the council Ian Stuart with letters from the council

Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses