News RSS Feed


Dorset farmer vows to protect livestock from dogs

Farmer Pete Davies with the sheep which was attacked on his farm by a dog Farmer Pete Davies with the sheep which was attacked on his farm by a dog Buy this photo »

A FARMER who has seen nine of his sheep attacked by a dog within a year says he will shoot the animal next time he sees it going after his livestock.

The latest attack at Higher South Buckland Farm near Chickerell saw a sheep badly mauled and Pete Davies says it is becoming a real concern with lambing season around a month away.

He claims his flock have been attacked by the same dog which is walked in the area.

He said: “This was the fourth attack within 11 months and it’s the ninth sheep that’s been taken out.

“It’s the same dog every time, we know who it is.”

Mr Davies, 55, said one of the sheep had to be put down but he has managed to nurse the others back to health.

He said: “We had to destroy one because it had ripped its belly wide open but we managed to save the rest.”

Mr Davies, who has been at Higher South Buckland Farm for 10 years, said the latest sheep attacked was also expected to make a full recovery.

He said: “It’s been badly mauled around the neck and the flank.

“It will recover but it’s going to take time and a lot of antibiotics.”

Mr Davies, who keeps 265 breeding ewes on the farm, said he had actually seen the dog he believes is responsible attacking his sheep in the summer and has threatened to take action if he witnesses it again.

He said: “With lambing season just a month off it’s a bit of a concern.

“If I witness it again I shall shoot the dog.”

Mr Davies said he had informed the police, dog warden and RSPCA about the constant attacks in the hope that they would do something and was hoping for further discussions with local police in coming days.

He added: “We did see it in action in the summer, me and my wife, and the police have been out, but without me witnessing it there’s not a lot I can do.

“I have been speaking to the local officer and I will sort it but it just takes time.”

Mr Davies is not the only farmer to have his sheep attacked by dogs recently.

Last month David Legg was forced to move 300 breeding ewes at Broomhills Farm near West Bay after one sheep had its belly ripped open and another died after being bit in the throat.

In December nine sheep were killed at Balfours Farm in Wool in what farmer Di Brown described as a ‘horrific’ dog attack.

THE Animals Act of 1971 entitl-es a landowner to kill a dog if they believe it is worrying or about to worry livestock and there are no other reasonable means of preventing the worrying. They are also entitled to take action if the dog has been worrying livestock, has not left the vicinity and is not under the control of any person. The Dogs (Protection of Livestock) Act of 1953 states that a dog is deemed to be ‘worrying’ livestock if it is attacking livestock or chasing it. A dog can also deemed to be worrying livestock if it is not on a lead and under control in a field in which there are sheep.

Comments(9)

Presstostop says...
12:11pm Wed 15 Feb 12

Its a pity that the law doesn't allow him to shoot the owner of the dog as well.

cj07589 says...
12:15pm Wed 15 Feb 12

All the best to Mr Davies, I do not blame you one bit for wanting to shoot the dog causing these horrific attacks. There is nothing more distressing than seeing a wounded ewe with off spring suffering all due to a callous and grossly irresponsible dog owner. I hope you get the dog asap and stop this ghastly mutilation in its tracks for good.

RobinofLocksley says...
12:43pm Wed 15 Feb 12

Four times? That's taking patience too far, mate. Just shoot it.

Mr Peter Melon says...
1:25pm Wed 15 Feb 12

Re: the recent story about the demise of Weymouth Town centre and how the Council are to blame. Well Council men and Women, a chance to redeem yourselves. All you need to do is employ Mr Davies to take up a suitable position and shoot all the scum and human "dogs" that you have allowed the town to be overun and infected by !

roger goss says...
2:48pm Wed 15 Feb 12

the farmer should have shot it by now waiting a year is rather stupid of him, the dog should have been shot at the first opportunity, the law is on his side.the owner should be taken to court and made to pay full price as compensation.

CozIsaid says...
10:00am Thu 16 Feb 12

How dare the owner of that dog let his/her dog continue!! The farmer knows who it is, omg, do something, shoot the savage beast! We are behind you all the way.

Desk24 says...
1:21pm Thu 16 Feb 12

I would imagine that what kind of breed of dog is important on purchase; or 'other care' pre ownership thinkng.

devilstail says...
1:27pm Fri 17 Feb 12

Hang on before the pitch fork brigade get all up in arms, but this is just a non story.

“We did see it in action in the summer, me and my wife, and the police have been out, but without me witnessing it there’s not a lot I can do."

Well either you did witness it or not? and if you didn't witness it, how do they know it is the same dog and not foxes and then they happened to see a dog running around.

If this is someone who always walks their dog in the area, and the attack has been witnessed then surely the Police would have evidence to rightly speak to the owner and prosecute DNA technology and all that.

Amazing that we always here these stories, but never the other side of the story. My suspicions that this is a farmer who has had a run in with an individual and now trying to stitch them up.

Merlin of Britain says...
5:42pm Fri 17 Feb 12

People have relatively unrestricted access to the countryside these days, but that is PEOPLE - just where dogs come into the picture leaves me at something of a loss. WHY do some people seem to think it's acceptable to take dogs onto someone else's land - or public land - and then let them run around loose, chasing Wildlife and livestock..?? If I'd been that farmer, it would just have been a case of "BANG..!!" the first time it happened - end of story. Unless, of course, the dogger started behaving objectionably, too....

Until we get a rational government that prohibits private ownership of dogs, except for those needed by farmers and by the disabled or blind, then people must take vastly greater responsibility for what they - or their dogs - do on land that THEY don't own....

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree