RESIDENTS in a community on the edge of Weymouth celebrated after plans for a controversial housing development were shelved by councillors in a fiery discussion.

Councillors were warned, however, that the decision to turn down the 340 homes plans could prove costly for the council if the judgement is challenged.

The developers said they may consider appealing after members of Weymouth and Portland Borough Council’s planning committee went against officers’ advice and voted against outline proposals for up to 340 homes on land south of Nottington Lane.

A dozen residents, including ward councillor Pam Nixon, spoke at the meeting about their concerns. Issues included safety fears amid increased traffic and the prospect of flooding.

Nottington resident Helen Laffineur said: “Nottington is a tiny, historic village. If they build in that field, we are going to get swallowed up by the urbanisation of Weymouth.”

Sally Wills, who has lived in the village for more than 30 years, said: “This development will have a profound effect on residents.

“Visitors come here for the peace and quiet and the rural atmosphere, which will be destroyed by the density of the proposed housing.”

Committee vice chairman Cllr Margaret Leicester said it would be “impossible” for councillors to refuse the plan and the refusal could “cost this council a fortune” if the applicant appeals.

Cllr Christine James said: “We are actually not allowed to think any more. I have long thought that we are building houses for people that we do not necessarily have the jobs for.”

She added: “We voted against it, so find some wording that fits with whatever you want it to fit in with.”

It was ultimately refused on the grounds that insufficient information was provided for councillors to fully assess the impact on road safety and the effect of additional surface water run-off.

Speaking after the meeting, Cllr Leicester said the council is bound by the National Planning Policy Framework and would risk losing an appeal.

She added: “If it goes to appeal, then it can be awarded permission, but it might not have all the conditions an officer would put on it and we can be charged for not listening to officers.

“Councils are so strapped for money these days.

“I was afraid false hope was being given to those people.”

Also speaking after the meeting, David Lohfink, of developers CG Fry and Son, which had submitted the application, said: “When you get a refusal contrary to recommendation, [an appeal] is always on the cards.

“We will read the full reasons for refusal and then risk assess the next steps – one of which is an appeal.”

Mrs Laffineur said the residents were “ecstatic” with the result.

She added: “It is great to think that democracy can rule the day.

“We have all just been celebrating.

“It is wonderful news and it has really brought the community together.”