In the post-Brexit world we will need to start making a range of decisions in London about environmental issues which have been hitherto made in Brussels.

This raises interesting questions.

The first question is whether we are going to operate on the basis of the precautionary principle, that has governed EU environmental policy.

My own hunch is that we will - and I welcome this because I think it is sensible to operate on a “no regrets” basis when it comes to the ecosystem.

But, we will need to be careful to apply the precautionary principle in a balanced and proportionate way.

An interesting example is provided by two families of chemicals about which the EU is currently making decisions. I am sure this is going to be an area of huge controversy because there are groups lining up to ban both of these families of chemicals (glysophates and neonicotinoids) completely and groups equally determined that their use should be permitted without constraint.

Having looked into the various claims and counter-claims I have become persuaded that the way to the argument actually falls very differently in the two cases. So far as I can see, glysophates, if applied in the correct way and at an appropriate stage in the agricultural cycle pose no significant risks and should consequently be allowed subject to careful rules about how they are used; whereas although the evidence is not conclusive, there do seem to be strong enough reasons to worry about the effects of neonicotinoids on bees that make it sensible for us to ban their use until and unless it can be robustly demonstrated that the bee population will not suffer in the way that some of the science currently suggests it may.