OF the two main events occurring in Berlin yesterday, probably the escaped bull provoked less alarm. The reaction to the hapless beast that ran amok on a motorway was as nothing compared to the consternation which greeted the meeting of Tony Blair, Jacques Chirac and Gerhard Schroeder. Although the big three later attempted to cool tempers by billing their gathering as a mere
tidying-up exercise on economic competitiveness, there was no disguising the major political upset caused.
Admittedly, after the ill-will caused by Iraq and the failure to push forward on a European constitution, it does not take much for the red mist to descend on the rainbow coalition that is the soon-to-be-enlarged EU. Even so, the strength of enmity among those not invited to Berlin was remarkable. Poland complained of being shut out before it had even entered, and existing EU members worried they were being relegated to the second division. Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian prime minister, accused the big three of creating ''a big mess''. Little wonder Jack Straw, the British foreign secretary, had to begin the day by engaging in telephone dip-lomacy with his Italian, Spanish and Polish counterparts.
Why should the Berlin meeting arouse such suspicion? The EU is, after all, built on shifting alliances. The
Franco-German axis is long established, and Britain is not averse to entering into partnerships when it suits. But the switch from several marriages of convenience to a single menage a trois has provoked intense jealousy, and not without cause. Britain, France and Germany wield enormous clout. The trio's GDP exceeds that of all the other EU countries combined. On defence spending, population and voting strength, they punch at the highest weight. Although it would not be difficult for them to
dictate the entire EU agenda, it would be extremely unwise.
What concerns those nations outside the triumvirate is not what was said at the official summit (so far apart are the three on economic reform that it would be difficult to see them agreeing on a single way forward), but what went on last night over dinner. It is here, critics fear, that the real carve-up took place on matters such as the EU constitution and the new commission president. If that was indeed the case, those nations not at the table have every right to complain. As the EU grows it should strive to be more democratic and accountable, not less so. It may enhance the domestic reputations of Messrs Blair, Chirac and Schroeder to hold court in Berlin, but the wider cause of European harmony requires the EU to go forward as one. If the democratic whole is to flourish, the days of the big two, or even the big three, must be numbered.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article