News RSS Feed


Speeding: Disgust as safety camera is burnt out


ARSONISTS have targeted a speed camera in a West Dorset village.

Police are investigating after a tyre was put over the fixed speed camera and set alight on the busy A35 in Chideock, near Bridport, around 5.20am yesterday.

Chideock traffic protester Tony Fuller said he was disgusted by the arson attack and warned it would ‘cost lives’ if motorists sped through the village.

Mr Fuller, 77, said: “As far as I’m concerned anyone who does anything like that should be locked up and the key thrown away because they’re complete and utter idiots.

“If the speed camera isn’t working to deter motorists, someone could get killed easy.”

Mr Fuller and other members of The A35 Protest Group have been asked by police to use hand-held speed cameras to monitor traffic.

He added: “I’m worried that if people can do this to a speed camera, what would they do to a couple of old fogies with a camera?”

Protest group member Reme Cortis said: “I couldn’t believe it when I saw the burnt camera, it’s a disgrace.”

The camera was at the centre of controversy two years ago when it emerged it had illegally caught thousands of motorists between 1997 and 2007 due to an administrative blunder, which referred to the A35 junction with Seatown Road, when it should have been Duck Street.

Witnesses and anyone with information about the damage should contact Bridport police on 01305 222222.

Comments(28)

ballstoit says...
10:20am Mon 16 Aug 10

The camera coming INTO Chideock is fine and should be left alone- the camera at the base of the hill LEAVING is ridiculous and should be burnt, blown up, destroyed..etc...
Being cursed with a small-engined gutless car I find the lack of 'run-up' almost unbearable.
I literaly get pushed up this hill by angry HGV drivers thanks to the fact I've had to approach it at 30mph and quicly ran out of steam - depite having passed the village by this point.

To be honest I'm getting fed up with moaning Chideock residents. If you dont like trafic why did you move to a village that straddles the busiest A road in Dorset??

nigefromdorchester says...
11:16am Mon 16 Aug 10

Sadly Mr Fuller is confusing Road safety with speed cameras. It is common knowledge that Speed cameras do not improve road safety. They merely collect money. Speed cameras are a speed tax.

Indeed the Department of Transport readily admits that less than 4% of accidents are caused by excessive speeds. Therefore, 96% of accidents have nothing to do with speed at all. Mr Fuller should campaign for safer roads and not for an increase in the speed tax

Techie says...
11:48am Mon 16 Aug 10

I've got a fantastic method I worked out for avoiding the 'speed tax'. Can anyone guess what it is?

nigefromdorchester says...
12:50pm Mon 16 Aug 10

I bet it is this

www.photoblockeruk.c
om

acop40 says...
12:57pm Mon 16 Aug 10

Techie wrote:
I've got a fantastic method I worked out for avoiding the 'speed tax'. Can anyone guess what it is?
Using someone elses number plate?
Speed on.

Duckorange says...
1:01pm Mon 16 Aug 10

Techie wrote:
I've got a fantastic method I worked out for avoiding the 'speed tax'. Can anyone guess what it is?
You're going to be sensible and say drive slower, aren't you?
Or, buy a Polish-registered car from your plumber.
Or, get a job at the US Embassy, and never pay a road fine, ever.

lostindorset says...
1:17pm Mon 16 Aug 10

Obviously no one should be burning cameras.

However Mr Fuller, can you not see that you are CAUSING these problems. You and your missguided protest, being run by those who MOVED INTO the village with the road like that, who seem to think that all the traffic should go else where (yeah build a bypass through countryside, destroy it, just so you have a bit of piece).

Your protest is costing local businesses money due to causing delays (leave the traffic lights alone), making men and women who have worked hard, late home for their dinner, and CAUSING ACCIDENTS futher on down the road, due to cars hitting other cars caught in tail backs that you caused.

And now the police are giving you more of a god complex with the guns.

Heres an idea, why dont the police go down and sort the speeding out, and why dont MR fuller and his gang move away from the road which will always be busy. It is an A road, it is the main route into devon from the south, so either accept it and move and give all us LOCALS some piece and quiet!

lostindorset says...
1:18pm Mon 16 Aug 10

and shame on you Echo for giving the idiot space in your paper

Mr-tumble says...
1:27pm Mon 16 Aug 10

Wow he does look angry though!

MartiB says...
1:31pm Mon 16 Aug 10

Ah is this the same Mr Fuller who orchestrated a campaign of obstructing the Queens Highway, through his village despite it being an 'A' road and the only main road in the area. Causing traffic jams at peak times which would have backed up and potentially causing accidents as those unaware of Mr Fullers childish antics, could have crashed into stationary traffic. All because he was trying to sell his house.
Mr Fuller is hardly qualified to talk about road safety, the word hypocrisy springs to mind.
I also believe that the MAJORITY of the inhabitants of Chideock, do not support Mr Fuller or his self interest protests.

Stunned says...
1:51pm Mon 16 Aug 10

Mr-tumble wrote:
Wow he does look angry though!
He looks more sad than angry and his expression amplifies this.

McCrabby says...
1:52pm Mon 16 Aug 10

Why didn't they set fire to the push button on the crossing, that would stop Mr Fuller playing silly b*****rs!!

Insight says...
2:10pm Mon 16 Aug 10

"Mr Fuller and other members of The A35 Protest Group have been asked by police to use hand-held speed cameras to monitor traffic. He added: “I’m worried that if people can do this to a speed camera, what would they do to a couple of old fogies with a camera?”
...
I've often wondered about the wisdom of these so called speed camera partnerships promoting this kind of behaviour, on the one hand it's open to self styled vigilantism and on the other it's never seemed like a sensible idea putting old people potentially in harms way like that.
At least Mr Fuller saw that one coming.

Insight says...
2:15pm Mon 16 Aug 10

Latest News:
The West Midlands Road Safety Board, who oversee 300 fixed, red light and mobile speed cameras are considering scrapping them after the government cut £38m off the £95m a year national budget.

Insight says...
2:18pm Mon 16 Aug 10

Don't bother burning them, at this rate of partnership closure and camera dumping by councils up and down the land it's doesn't seem worth the wasted petrol anymore.

FECKIT says...
4:10pm Mon 16 Aug 10

Mr Fuller get a life.

Best thing for them is a good BBQ.

Mabu says...
5:49pm Mon 16 Aug 10

If you have the nerve and put a big red button on your dashboard!...
.
http://www.youtube.c
om/watch?v=zev2vIHcj
Cc&feature=related

bootedsw says...
6:42pm Mon 16 Aug 10

Must be a slow news day - Shock horror the traffic is flowing what drivel can we put on the front page.
Such a shame now you might get a lovely speed camera partnership wagon parked in some location where a normal motorist would get a ticket, maybe blocking your drive or parked on the grass verge by a double yellow line.

martaaay says...
6:43pm Mon 16 Aug 10

waste of petrol and rubber, the fixed ones dont even catch enough these days to pay for themselves, why else are they being abandoned. In other news I have noticed our now rebranded 'dorset road safety team' VERY busy lately, even out taking pictures of the countryside on a sunday no doubt trying to raise as much in fines as possible to ensure their own survival

RobinofLocksley says...
7:14pm Mon 16 Aug 10

I don't believe he's as grumpy as he looks - someone has got his pet campaign back in the news for him.

siratb says...
8:10pm Mon 16 Aug 10

Wasn't he pictured by the loos in Greenhill - or maybe it is the the Echo photographer's trade mark folded-arms-and-I-am
-disgusted-face?!
.
I think we should use the Norwegian example - a high velocity bullet through the camera from 500m away. Less chance of getting caught.

fishman68 says...
7:16am Tue 17 Aug 10

Great news! One less tax camera to worry about any chance of superglueing the pedestrian crossing button so that local vigilanti idiot can be silenced for eternity. Some old folk have nothing better to do with their time with any luck the normal locals will see him off! For the record I do welcome more actual police on our roads these so called safety cameras are a revenue device nothing more at least this one is gone and I doubt they will have the money to replace it!-happy days for common sense!

JANEAUSTEN says...
8:38am Tue 17 Aug 10

If speeding is a traffic offence, why are all these drivers complaining about being caught?
Because they dont want to pay the fine, or because they dont agree with the law( that speeding is an offence?).

FECKIT says...
9:01am Tue 17 Aug 10

catch me if you can.....

siratb says...
10:25am Tue 17 Aug 10

JANEAUSTEN wrote:
If speeding is a traffic offence, why are all these drivers complaining about being caught? Because they dont want to pay the fine, or because they dont agree with the law( that speeding is an offence?).
Ignoring the 103mph idiot - Because speeding in itself isn't necessarily dangerous (as any traffic cop will tell you), but it is very easy to catch people by placing cameras strategically and changing speed limits.
.
So I don't think speeding should automatically be an offence, but should be judged by a traffic officer after considering the speed, style of driving, weather, location etc...and if (s)he considers it an offence then that should be good enough.
.
Speed cameras are purely revenue generating measures. If they wanted to slow people through places like Chideock then implement traffic calming measures.

skyblueneil says...
11:00am Tue 17 Aug 10

i'm waiting for the next picture with him craking a whip.....indiana ha ha

FECKIT says...
1:11pm Tue 17 Aug 10

siratb wrote:
JANEAUSTEN wrote: If speeding is a traffic offence, why are all these drivers complaining about being caught? Because they dont want to pay the fine, or because they dont agree with the law( that speeding is an offence?).
Ignoring the 103mph idiot - Because speeding in itself isn't necessarily dangerous (as any traffic cop will tell you), but it is very easy to catch people by placing cameras strategically and changing speed limits. . So I don't think speeding should automatically be an offence, but should be judged by a traffic officer after considering the speed, style of driving, weather, location etc...and if (s)he considers it an offence then that should be good enough. . Speed cameras are purely revenue generating measures. If they wanted to slow people through places like Chideock then implement traffic calming measures.
Well said Siratb.

Also those that shout that speed kills are obviously those that are
too old to drive and go soooo slow which makes them dangerous hazards, how often I have nearly been wiped out on main roads in perfect conditions by some old biddy who can't see over their steering wheel, can't see! can't drive or does not realise that there is other traffic on the road, whether I have been in a car or on motorbike they are more of a danger than drivers that can handle their cars, are aware of others and use speed safely.

More police on the roads and generally them being seen is far better use of resources than these contraptions that are pure revenue makers.

bootedsw says...
5:19pm Tue 17 Aug 10

istr they set the speed limit in the country when a cars braking system was in its early years and they have never changed them now that many cars can drive faster and brake quicker quite safely. Shouldn't the limits be reviewed, I personally think the germans have the right idea if you and another car are caught in the yellow box on motorway together you get a ticket. it takes speed out of the equation.


Angry: Tony Fuller Angry: Tony Fuller

Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses