News RSS Feed


Dorset cuts crisis: Lollipop campaigners vow to fight on

CAMPAIGNERS have vowed to fight on after councillors voted to continue a consultation process that will decide whether to keep school crossing guards in Dorset.

They were told that that a Policy Development Panel (PDP) will be set up to investigate ways in which the county council-funded service can be saved.

Dorset County Council will continue consultations with schools and local authorities on proposals to save £200,000 a year by withdrawing the salaries of lollipop men and women.

Concerned parents and trade unionists protested on the steps of County Hall in Dorchester before the full council meeting.

Council chiefs suggest paid crossing guards could be replaced with volunteers or alternative funding could be found from the community.

Councillors at the meeting were asked to respond to a petition of 10,000 signatures against plans to cut funding for the service.

Speaking after the meeting, campaigner Helen Toft said: “I’m going to keep fighting.

“If we don’t find the volunteers then the service will go.

“I feel sorry that however many facts I put in front of the councillors they don’t seem to accept that there’s no community funding for this.

“In deprived areas of Weymouth and Portland there’s no money from the community to do this.”

Mrs Toft warned that many schools could find themselves without crossing patrols while the consultation is being carried out.

She said: “If you are a school crossing guard then you will start looking for another job right now.

“They won’t be recruiting for replacement school crossing patrols. I don’t think it’s been thought through in real practical terms.”

Council leader Angus Campbell said choosing to consult on the service was an unpleasant job.

“We have been given a job to do by the coalition government which isn’t a pleasant one.

“We need to work with local authorities and schools to help us do the things we have to do,” he said.

Peter Finney, the cabinet member for transport, said the council is not obliged to provide the service.

“I would remind members that we are facing a major financial crisis.

“The school crossing patrol service is not something that the county council has to by law provide.

“If we take volunteers on there is no difference in training for volunteers as there is for full-time employees.”

Lodmoor councillor Brian Ellis said axing the patrols would turn council policy ‘on its head’.

“Children will be taken to school in cars, which will increase traffic. We’ve had proposals to do walking buses. This turns it on its head.

“Consult if you will, but do not simply turn around and say use volunteers and say the money is coming from the school.”

Janet Dover, leader of the council’s Lib-Dem group, abstained from the consultation vote and proposed setting up the PDP for school crossing guards.

She said: “We will be doing everything we can to find alternative funding for school crossing patrols.

“I’d like to pay tribute to the campaigners who have fought for this.”

Comments(10)

Terrasfan says...
11:59am Fri 18 Feb 11

Given that the service is for under 11 year old, it can be debated that it is for older as well, but for these maths lets say 11. There are ABOUT 25,000 children between 5 and 11 in Dorset Schools. So divide that into 200,000 and I make that £8.00 a child for a year. That could be broken up into terms, say £3.00 a term, yes I know that makes £9.00 and that is enough to pay for the service.
Personally before you jump down my neck, I think the council should pay, but would it not be worth parents paying £3.00 a term when they pay the school fund money, or whatever they pay nowadays.
Or what about half each?
If you think the figures are wrong, then blame the council again as it was their website I got the ballpark figure of 25,000. If of course you include older children, the cost comes down.
Or are the parents already paying enough?
Whatever the answer, I think the service is very important, and should be kept.

fastjet says...
12:28pm Fri 18 Feb 11

There is an easy solution get all the mums that sit around watching daytime tv to get a rota ...I would only work out 1 day per month depending on the size of the school...Stop whinging and put something back into the community

Be_Happy says...
12:47pm Fri 18 Feb 11

and what do these mums do with the children who are not of school age?
Who pays for the insurance for the workers?
Who pays for the crb checks?
Who has not thought thier idea out very well?

weymouthfox says...
1:25pm Fri 18 Feb 11

Taking away school crossing patrols could lead to a child being killed. What a mean economy. Driving past Weymouth College yesterday, I noticed a crossing patrol helping the students cross the road! I'm sure that at their age, this is quite unecessary.

MrsShrek says...
1:30pm Fri 18 Feb 11

Again, Angus Campbell attempts to deflect blame by passing the buck to the Coalition Government.

He hasn't been asked to do any unpleasant jobs by the coalition. Dorset's settlement was INCREASED on last years'; Dorset has MORE money than previously.

He's having to cut essential services, under the pretence of national cut backs, because his council have been profligate and mismanaged their own finances in recent years.

He's trying to cover up his own poor leadership.

radiator says...
1:41pm Fri 18 Feb 11

Does anyone know how much these lollypop persons earn a week? Ill bet its not much and a small price to pay for childrens safety. Its all very well saying that parents would do it but unless proper training was given it would be an accident waiting to happen to have tom dick and harry taking it in turns for the job. Its really ironic millions can be spent on the useless traffic lights for motorists,yet the lives of children and there safety doesnt seem important

MrsShrek says...
2:25pm Fri 18 Feb 11

weymouthfox wrote:
Taking away school crossing patrols could lead to a child being killed. What a mean economy. Driving past Weymouth College yesterday, I noticed a crossing patrol helping the students cross the road! I'm sure that at their age, this is quite unecessary.
Whilst I'm certain college students will make use of the existing service, I suspect it's actually there for the kids at St Johns primary school, behind the college.

MaidofDorset says...
9:13am Sat 19 Feb 11

If only one child is seriously injured a year the medical costs and perhaps 60 years of social care costs will wipe out any saving made.

It's like buying the really cheap washing up liquid in the supermarket. A false economy.

MaidofDorset says...
9:29am Sat 19 Feb 11

How does the cost compare of employing 1 lolly-pop person for a year against a pool of 50 volunteers who have to be CRB checked, have photo identity cards provided, go on a child protection/road safety course and be insured?

Can someone in the council do the maths please?

106dl says...
11:49am Thu 24 Feb 11

Get rid of the district council. It's only a matter of time before the government gets rid of this unelected body that is the antithesis of democracy. As the funding to this council has been increased, if anybody is going to go it has to be the self-replicating parasitic bureaucrats in the district, and elsewhere.

Local Businesses

Most popular