£2million is possibly needed for Dorchester's Charles Street development

DEVELOPMENT: Charles Street

DEVELOPMENT: Charles Street

First published in News Dorset Echo: Photograph of the Author by , Senior Reporter

UP to £2million of taxpayers’ money may have to be spent on Dorchester’s controversial Charles Street development if it is to go ahead.

West Dorset District Council faces a choice of sticking with the current scheme, which it admits is not viable in the current economic climate, or amending the details of phase two of the development at considerable cost.

The amended scheme proposed by Developers’ Simons would see the planned hotel scrapped in favour of 24 apartments and the basement car park axed while a single-deck facility was built on the Fairfield market site instead.

The report warns if the council does not take action the two anchor tenants lined up for the scheme, Waitrose and Marks and Spencer, could withdraw.

The first phase of the scheme has already caused widespread anger as the council voted to build its new headquarters and a new library on the site.

The report also recommends that preparatory works costing up to £2million are funded by the council. This includes relocating Dorchester Family Church from Acland Road to a new home in Trinity Street.

And despite calls for wider public involvement, the district council will not hold a public consultation before the decision is made.

Instead, plans will be put on display at a venue to be confirmed, with staff on hand to answer questions.

In a report, council officers said that no public funds would be needed if the current development is supported by councillors, but this may lead to the loss of businesses who have already signed up to the scheme.

The report said: “The council has the choice of either waiting for the economy to improve, or accepting that changes be made to the scheme. “Waiting for the economy to improve could lead to the loss of key anchor tenants and it is therefore suggested that accepting changes to the scheme is the best way of achieving a development and securing over 600 jobs.”

The £2million would come from the corporate priorities reserve fund, it is suggested.

Changes proposed by developers Simons include not having a hotel, but instead building 24 market flats.

The lower basement car park should also be scrapped, it has been suggested, and replaced with a deck of car parking at Fairfield car park, which would meet the required total of 484 spaces. Within the changes, the district council have also been asked to agree to retain short stay parking at Wollaston Fields for 25 years.

The report states that to move the project forward the Council could take forward some preparatory work at a cost of £2 million.

That includes:- n Relocating the Dorchester Community Church from Acland Road to Trinity Street to a new church building provided by the Council and acquiring the Church’s freehold interest by means of a land swap.

  •  Securing the pedestrian access and landing rights though the Tudor and Hardye arcades.
  •  Securing other access rights including making the appropriate traffic regulation orders.
  •  Securing rights of light and other legal costs.

West Dorset District Council Technical Services Manager Steve Woollard said: “The council has worked hard to achieve a town centre development on the Charles Street site for some 30 years. The current proposals which have planning permission are the closest that has been achieved to success.

“Waiting for the economy to improve could lead to the loss of key anchor tenants and it is therefore suggested that the option of accepting changes to the scheme is the best way of achieving a development and securing over 600 jobs. However, there are risks in this approach which councillors need to bear in mind when they make a decision.”

Statement by Simons

IN a statement, Andrew Pollett, project director for Simons, said: “Simons Developments can confirm its commitment to the second phase of the Charles Street project.

“The plan was always to complete the office phase of the development before moving on to the retail element and this remains the case.”

District's Exisiting Building Not Sold

A separate report to councillors says the district council has still not managed to sell its current offices. It received two bids to buy Stratton House but neither reached the sum it expected.

Director of Resources Jason Vaughan sai “Although the results of the initial tender exercise are not what we would have hoped for, there are still a number of options to progress the disposal of the site which will be presented to the council’s Executive Committee next week.

“More details about each of these options will be needed before any decisions can be made, however, should the council choose to sell Stratton House for a lesser sum, or indeed retain the site until the property market recovers, the project to relocate to the new, smaller and more efficient offices in Charles Street will still deliver annual savings.”

Comments (7)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

11:54am Thu 4 Oct 12

snowleopard says...

Charles Street WDDC - Harbour Repairs
WPBC These are councils that share the executives and we have 2 questionable schemes that shouldn't with proper management and fiscal studies reached these points now.
Charles Street WDDC - Harbour Repairs WPBC These are councils that share the executives and we have 2 questionable schemes that shouldn't with proper management and fiscal studies reached these points now. snowleopard
  • Score: 0

12:29pm Thu 4 Oct 12

DucksQuack says...

The "corporate priorities reserve fund"
Is that made up of public money or not?

I think we should all listen to a reasoned update on why this is required. The development is good for the town.

The question is whether or not the council are capable of offering this.
The "corporate priorities reserve fund" Is that made up of public money or not? I think we should all listen to a reasoned update on why this is required. The development is good for the town. The question is whether or not the council are capable of offering this. DucksQuack
  • Score: 0

1:40pm Thu 4 Oct 12

Dorset Boy says...

What do Gould/Clark/WDDC care about the town centre or shops, they have their Ivory Tower at the tax payers expense.
What do Gould/Clark/WDDC care about the town centre or shops, they have their Ivory Tower at the tax payers expense. Dorset Boy
  • Score: 0

3:11pm Thu 4 Oct 12

bnaty12 says...

You have two choices and two choices only, Corruption or incompetence. If this was the private sector all of these morons would be sacked, not get big wages and nice pensions. It is time for accountability proper in the civil service.
You have two choices and two choices only, Corruption or incompetence. If this was the private sector all of these morons would be sacked, not get big wages and nice pensions. It is time for accountability proper in the civil service. bnaty12
  • Score: 0

4:27pm Thu 4 Oct 12

CoogarUK.com says...

Have either of the two so-called "key anchor tenants" actually signed on the dotted line yet? If not, then they cannot be 'lost' then, can they?

Not so long ago we were led to believe that offers for Stratton House had been flooding in. LIARS!
Have either of the two so-called "key anchor tenants" actually signed on the dotted line yet? If not, then they cannot be 'lost' then, can they? Not so long ago we were led to believe that offers for Stratton House had been flooding in. LIARS! CoogarUK.com
  • Score: 0

9:23pm Tue 9 Oct 12

almclean says...

If you are concerned about this, sign the petition here: http://charlesstreet
petition.org.uk/
If you are concerned about this, sign the petition here: http://charlesstreet petition.org.uk/ almclean
  • Score: 0

9:23pm Tue 9 Oct 12

almclean says...

http://charlesstreet
petition.org.uk/
http://charlesstreet petition.org.uk/ almclean
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree