Dorchester development branded a 'fiasco' (From Dorset Echo)
When news happens get involved. Send your pictures, views and video to us by text and email
Dorchester development branded a 'fiasco'
11:30am Thursday 4th October 2012 in News
CONSULTATION CALL Councillor Andy Canning, at one of the Charles Street protests
COUNCILLOR Andy Canning called for a public consultation before any decisions are made on the future of the scheme.
He said: “If the right way forward is found, putting some extra public money in would work, but it has to be a way forward that everyone agrees with.
“The council said that spending £16million on new offices would help kick start the building of new shops on Charles Street, and help create 600 new jobs. Well, the offices are nearly finished and there’s no sign of the shops.”
District councillors were briefed on the options in a closed meeting last week.
Coun Alistair Chisholm said the private meeting made a ‘mockery’ of the recommendations set out in a report by independent auditors KPMG earlier in the year.
In May the body recommended that the council ‘improve engagement with members and the public through more pro-active communication on the rationale for procedures’.
Coun Chisholm said: “We are talking about massive amounts of public money.
“Other than the option of doing nothing, I can’t see any of the other options could be achieved without looking at the investment of more public money, and that needs to go back to the public.
“It feels as though they are determined to forge ahead with the Charles Street scheme at any cost, just to save face. It is a fiasco”
The report said that because the site already has planning permission, and ‘the need to maintain certainty for the developers and the anchor tenants’, a public consultation was not considered to be appropriate.
Comments(6)
Fred Kite
says...
11:58am Thu 4 Oct 12
Dorset Boy
says...
1:43pm Thu 4 Oct 12
bnaty12
says...
3:40pm Thu 4 Oct 12
A civil service that seemingly answers to nobody and when there is any answering to be done, they have a complaint system that is designed to run you around in circles and hopefully you will give up, if you don't they will then give it over to a toothless Quango staffed by more of the same.
It is high time for proper transparency and true accountability. How can these estimates keep getting so wrong, sometimes 100's of percent wrong. sack the idiots doing it, if it was private sector you would be out of a job, not being paid a hundred grand of tax payers money to wash over it and carry on.
CoogarUK.com
says...
4:16pm Thu 4 Oct 12
Btw, I believe phase two only has outline planning permission, not detailed, though will happily stand corrected on this if wrong.
alan_h
says...
4:46pm Thu 4 Oct 12
CoogarUK - even if phase two did have detailed planning permission, that would hardly apply to the proposed amended plans and certainly not to any construction at Fairfield.
ETV says...
11:45am Thu 4 Oct 12